You Think You Got Audited?

Getting an audit notice from the IRS isn't anyone's idea of a party. But it's not the end of the world. Usually the auditor just wants to make sure you're entitled to the breaks you've claimed. Did you really spend as much as you reported on meals & entertainment? Did you really spend enough hours managing your rental properties to qualify as a "real estate professional"? If the IRS finds a mistake, they issue a "deficiency notice" and bill you for what you owe. How bad can it really be?

Well, just ask Raymond J. Lane.

Ray Lane is a longtime tech industry veteran. He started his career at IBM, then moved to Electronic Data Systems and Booz Allen Hamilton before becoming Chairman and CEO of Oracle Corporation. More recently, he's been a partner at the venture capital firm of Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, a board member at Fisker Automotive, and non-executive Chairman of Hewlett-Packard.

In 2000, Lane invested $25 million into a partnership, Vanadium Partners Fund LLC, to invest in technology startups. The fund used a strategy called "Partnership Option Portfolio Securities," or POPS, to generate paper losses far in excess of his actual investment. Then he claimed $251 million in losses to offset income he recognized from exercising Oracle stock options.

Since then, the government has taken direct aim at POPS and similar "abusive" strategies, arguing that they lack economic substance. Lane reports that the IRS originally audited him in 2004, then asked him to sign extensions on a statute of limitations every 18 months while they reviewed his file. Last December, they found the partnership to be a sham, with no "legitimate business purpose." In fact, they argued, Lane's $25 million "investment" — which he claimed was for warrants in the LLC — was designed merely to disguise fees paid to tax-shelter promoters and tax professionals. Lane filed an appeal with the Tax Court. Then, on May 6, he announced he had signed an agreement to pay the IRS $100 million!.

For his part, Lane says "the thing is unfortunate." (Really?) He adds that "the amount of taxes I pay are staggering, and this is the only transaction I've been audited on." He claims to have paid between 32% and 38% of his income in net taxes in the past 15 years. Now, while paying the $100 million to the IRS will certainly hurt, it won't put him in the poorhouse. He still owns two homes across the street from each other in pricey Atherton, California, worth a total of $30 million, along with a home in Manhattan Beach worth $20 million, a farm in Oregon worth $4 million, and two properties in Palm Desert, California, worth another $10 million.

But still . . . a $100 million tax bill! Can you imagine signing that check? Or even authorizing that wire transfer?

Here at our firm, we understand that if you ever get an audit notice, you're not going to be happy — even if there's not a hundred million bucks at stake! That's why we stick with tried-and-true strategies to help you pay less. Everything we recommend is court-tested and IRS-approved. So call us to see how you can put some of these strategies to work for yourself!

New Audit Risk

New Audit Risk

 When it comes to audits, our friends at the IRS are interested in examining returns as accurately as possible. (No, they're not just interested in squeezing out more tax, and some audits actually result in refunds.) So the folks in the Small Business/Self-Employed area have compiled a series of Audit Technique Guides to help examiners with insight into issues and accounting methods unique to specific industries. As the IRS explains, "ATGs explain industry-specific examination techniques and include common, as well as unique, industry issues, business practices and terminology. Guidance is also provided on the examination of income, interview techniques and evaluation of evidence."

There are currently dozens of ATGs available. Some are straightforward and predictable, like attorneys, consultants, and child care providers. Others are more specialized or esoteric, like art galleries, cost segregation studies for real estate investors, and timber casualty losses. At one point, there were even two separate guides for Alaskan commercial fishing activities -- one for the fishermen who catch the fish and another for the vendors who sell it. You can find all of them online -- if you find yourself on the business end of an audit notice, reading your own industry's guide is like taking a sneak peek at your opponent's battle plan!

Naturally, the IRS wants to keep up with new challenges in new industries. And identity theft is one of those new industries playing a growing role in today's electronic and online economy. Identity thieves pretend to be someone else to access resources or obtain credit and other benefits -- like fraudulent tax refunds -- in that person's name. The problem is serious enough that the IRS has put identity theft at the top of its annual "dirty dozen" list of tax scams. And now, this year, the IRS has just issued an Audit Technique Guide for identity thieves.

You might be surprised that the IRS is publishing an audit guide for a clearly illegal business. But U.S. citizens are subject to tax on all worldwide income, from whatever source derived. The IRS really doesn't care how you make your income -- they just want their fair share. (Remember who finally nailed Al Capone?)

The good news is, there are plenty of legitimate deductions you can take to cut the tax on your spoils from identity theft. For example, you can deduct home office expenses if that's where you phish for information. Your home office qualifies if you use it "exclusively and regularly for administrative or management activities of your trade or business" and "you have no other fixed location where you conduct substantial administrative or management activities of your trade or business." To substantiate your deduction, keep a log and take photos to record your business use. It doesn't have to be an entire room -- you can claim any "separately identifiable" space you use for work. Rev. Proc. 2013-13 even offers an optional "safe harbor" method for deducting $5/foot for up to 300 square feet!

You can capitalize equipment like computers and printers that you use for hacking, or choose first-year expensing for faster deductions. You can also deduct day-to-day expenses, like internet access, utilities, and vehicle costs for driving to trash dumpsters to find personal information (mileage allowance or actual expenses). Some aggressive practitioners argue that you can even deduct business-related dry-cleaning expenses for "dumpster diving" outfits; however, there's no formal authority for this position.

We'll finish here with two important warnings. First, remember that identity theft is still a serious crime. If you're caught, you can face crushing fines, serious jail time, or both. And second, be very careful with anything you read around April Fools' Day!

Her Majesty, the Snoop

Her Majesty, the Snoop

Getting audited by the IRS is rarely anyone's spot of tea -- unless, of course, you're the auditor. But at least our IRS "plays fair" and uses your actual return to decide whether to audit you. Not so for the folks at Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs Service across the pond! 

Here in the former colonies, the IRS uses statistical analysis to find most of their audit targets. Every return gets a super-secret score called a Discriminant Information Function, or "DIF." The higher your DIF, the more potential the IRS sees for bringing in additional taxes in an audit. So, with limited resources available for auditing returns, the IRS naturally strives to audit the higher-scoring returns first. (It's like why Willie Sutton robbed banks -- because that's where the money was!) Generally, small businesses organized as sole proprietorships face the greatest chance of audit -- as high as 4% or more -- because they have the greatest opportunity to underreport income and overstate deductions. 

But back in the old country, HMRC is getting a little more aggressive. They're not just looking at tax returns. They've just announced a new program to use credit checks to find suspected tax cheats. The plan is to cross-check details of the income people report on their return against their actual spending, to identify those at risk of both legal and illegal tax avoidance. Officials have just finished a pilot program involving 20,000 people -- but they expect to expand it to as many as two million. Blimey! 

The program sounds straightforward enough. Let's say you operate Ye Olde Cock & Bull Pub in a small town somewhere outside London. You report £20,000 in income. But your credit file shows you spending closer to £30,000. Now ye olde tax authorities have reason to believe you're not reporting all those pints of Boddingtons you've served -- and they have actual evidence to make their case. 

The problem, of course, comes when the program finds stashes of suspicious but legitimate assets. Let's say you're Robert Crawley, the 6th Earl of Grantham. Your own family money, which dated back to the Wars of the Roses, is long since gone. So you marry an American heiress. You make a genteel living managing Downton Abbey and occasionally sitting in Parliament. But if HMRC reviews your credit file, they're likely to find spending way out of line with your stated income! You can explain it, of course, as part of your wife Cora's inheritance. But who wants to have to explain that sort of thing to the tax man, even if you are paying your fair share? 

Of course, the program also raises enormous privacy concerns. It's fashionable to say that in today's internet age, privacy is a relic of the past. But it's also hard to see a program like that flying here in the United States -- at least not without howls of protest. 

We all know that proactive planning is the key to paying the least amount of tax allowed by law. But did you know that planning can also cut your chance of getting audited? Reorganizing your sole proprietorship as a partnership or subchapter-S corporation, for example, can cut your risk of audit by as much as 90%. So call us when you're ready for a plan that lets you pay less tax and attract less attention!

Duh!

Three professors have just revealed that sort of earth-shattering information in the newest issue of Accounting Review. They analyzed data from 5,000 corporations over 17 years from 1992-2008 to answer an age-old question: "Do IRS Audits Deter Corporate Tax Avoidance?" And here's their startling conclusion — make sure you're sitting down to read it: when audit rates go up, so do taxes!

Shocking, isn't it? (Just FYI, "endogeneity" is a statistical condition that occurs when there's a correlation between a parameter or variable and an "error term." It can arise as a result of measurement error, or a few other things that require looking up, including autoregression with autocorrelated errors, simultaneity, omitted variables, or sample selection errors.)

The professors also argue that shareholders benefit from IRS audits — especially when corporate governance is weak. Co-author Jeffrey Hoopes of the University of Michigan reports that "strict tax enforcement promotes good financial reporting and tends to check managers' proclivities to divert corporate resources for their personal use under the guise of saving taxes.” They cite Tyco as an example, where top executives minimized taxes by relocating profits to low-tax foreign countries, then diverted millions of dollars for their own personal use. (Remember CEO Dennis Kozlowski, who spent $15,000 of shareholder money on an umbrella stand? Yeah, that guy . . . he's in jail now.)

What does all this mean for you? Well, audit rates for personal returns average just over one percent. That's a tiny fraction of the 30% or so that the biggest group of companies in the Accounting Review study faced. But we file every return as if we expect it to be audited. Yes, we work and plan to minimize your taxes. But the strategies we use are all court-tested and IRS-approved. That way, you save money and sleep well at night!

Tax Business, Russian Style

Tax Business, Russian Style

Working in the tax business is usually a pretty safe gig. You really just need an office, a computer with an internet connection, and a fast laser printer for all those piles of paper. There's not much heavy lifting -- and even less intrigue or danger. But sometimes the tax business is a different story. Just ask Pavel Petrovich Ivlev, who works (now) in suburban New Jersey.

Pavel was born in 1970 just outside Moscow. He earned a law degree from Moscow State University in 1993, studied more in Amsterdam and London, then joined an international law firm. At that point, he appeared set to become another one of a new breed of Russian lawyers, helping newly-privatized companies negotiate the awkward transition to "real" capitalism.

Pavel's clients included Yukos Oil, and its charismatic chairman, Mikhail Khodorkovsky. Khodorkovsky had started out collecting dues for the Communist Youth League. But as the Soviet Union collapsed, he rejected his old Leninist ideology. Taking advantage of glasnost and his party connections, he became an entrepreneur, published his own capitalist manifesto called The Man with the Ruble, and traded his way up to controlling 20% of Russia's lucrative oil production. For one brief shining moment, Khodorkovsky's $16 billion fortune made him the richest man in Russia and the 16th-richest man on earth.

In 1999, Vladimir Putin succeeded to Russia's Presidency. Putin had started his career in the KGB -- working counterintelligence, no less -- and he was no stranger to blunt force. (Google "Putin+thug" and you get 2,190,000 hits. 'Nuff said.) Putin quickly moved to tighten his grip on power, clamping down on elected officials and billionaire oligarchs alike. Khodorkovsky naturally pushed back, and at one point in 2003, embarrassed Putin in a nationally televised meeting of business leaders. Unfortunately, such resistance amounted to bringing the proverbial knife to a gunfight.

Eight months later, Putin had Khodorkovsky arrested, and slapped everyone else associated with Yukos with tax and fraud charges. And that's where our tax attorney friend Pavel comes back into the picture. Here's how he describes his own interrogation by government investigators. Clearly, they felt no need to screw around with the usual "good cop-bad cop" shtick -- or maybe the good cop was just off grabbing a ponchiki (Russian doughnut):

"On November 16, the lead detective in the case said to me 'Now I am going to interrogate you.'
I said, 'You can't do that, it's against the law.'
'I guess we are going to have to break the law then. Tell me all.'
'What do you want me to say?'
'You are the lawyer -- you know the penal code. Whatever you say, we'll use.'
'You want me to describe how we took sacks of cash out of Yukos and delivered them to Khodorkovsky personally?'
'Yes.'
'But nothing like that ever happened.'
That's when he threatened to arrest me."

Pavel's momma didn't raise any dummies. He caught the next plane out of Moscow and didn't even call his wife till he landed. But he remains under indictment in his homeland for stealing $2.4 billion, laundering $810 million, and evading tax on the gain. At least he's better off than his former client -- Khodorkovsky has spent the last seven years in a series of former Soviet prisons.

Look, there's nothing fun about the IRS. And we've all met someone who went through an "audit from hell." But few people actually flee abroad to shake off the tax man! So while we gripe about how much we pay, we can at least appreciate the IRS playing on a level field. Let Pavel's story help you feel fortunate that we won't be chased out of this country for paying less tax!