Dirty Money

Let's say you need someone to help you do something really important. Would you settle for someone who just Googled it? Would you look for someone with the right professional license? Or would you hold out for the guy who literally wrote the book on whatever it is you need to do? Expertise doesn't guarantee success: great surgeons still lose patients; great lawyers still lose cases; and Super Bowl-winning quarterbacks still throw into double coverage all the time. But sometimes professional prowess is well worth the extra cost.

This week's search for expertise takes us to the University of Miami in sunny Coral Gables, Florida. Bruce Bagley, 73, is a rumpled, jowly professor of International Relations. His field is Latin America, which seems appropriate for a university in a city that feels more like part of Latin America than the United States. His specialty is money laundering. And he's a card-carrying expert — in fact, he wrote the go-to book on the subject, Drug Trafficking, Organized Crime, and Violence in the Americas Today. He's even testified on it before Congress.

Back in 2016, some shady characters in Venezuela found themselves with some dirty money. They looked around for the guy who wrote the book, and they found Bagley. Maybe he wanted a little adventure that day. Maybe he'd just finished binge-watching Ozark. (If so, he really missed the point.) Maybe surrounding himself with all that criminality just eroded his moral compass. As Nietzsche said, "Beware that, when fighting monsters, you yourself do not become a monster. And if you gaze long into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you."

Whatever the reason, Bagley found himself with a new side gig running a specialized sort of laundromat. It's an easy business to start — you don't need a website, or business cards, or slick brochures. He probably thought he was downright brilliant. What better way to disguise your money laundering business than by being a professor of money laundering? We can just picture him sitting by the phone, waiting for the MacArthur Foundation people to call him with his Genius Grant. Unfortunately, someone else came calling.

Last month, the Department of Justice unsealed an indictment alleging Bagley had opened bank accounts to launder cash from bribes and embezzling. Those accounts received $200,000 in monthly deposits from overseas accounts owned by a Colombian national located in Switzerland and the United Arab Emirates. He passed 90% of the deposits on to a mysterious "Individual-1." Then he wired the remaining 10% into his personal account, which seems a fairly typical commission for fluffing and folding that sort of cash. That 10% added up to almost $300,000 over the course of the scheme.

Bagley may have made a bad choice — but it makes for a great final exam question: "You've been indicted on two counts of money laundering and one count of conspiring to commit money laundering. Each count carries possible tenure of 20 years in a federal facility where most of the laundry consists of orange jumpsuits. What do you do now?" Get your blue books and pens ready!

Although to date the IRS isn't involved in Bagley's case, money laundering often involves tax fraud, too — so the IRS Criminal Investigation unit routinely pursues money laundering crimes. (And what are the odds Bagley reported his side gig, anyway?) Now, we don't have any expertise in that area. We had to Google that 10% commission, honest! But if you're looking for legitimate ways to pay less tax in 2020, you've come to the experts. So call us, and see how much we can save! 

Pumpkin Spice-Flavored Taxes

October is chock-full of obscure holidays and commemorations. October 3 is National Boyfriend Day. October 15 — the real personal tax filing deadline — is National Grouch Day. (Coincidence? We think not.) October 19 serves up National Seafood Bisque Day (which sounds a lot tastier than October 25, National Greasy Food Day). Then there's October 21, National Clean Your Virtual Desktop Day, which sounds like it was cooked up by the same HR funsters who think "trust falling" into a co-worker's arms is somehow an appropriate thing to do at work. We swear we're not making any of this up.

But none of those can compare to the big orange ball of fun waiting towards the end of the month. We're talking about October 26: National Pumpkin Day. Believe it or not, pumpkins are more than just everyone's favorite gourd — they're responsible for generating millions of tax dollars for government everywhere.

For starters, check out actual pumpkin sales. Americans are expected to spend $377 million on cucurbita pepos to carve into jack o'lanterns in 2019. That means the IRS and state tax departments will harvest millions in income taxes from the farmers who grow them, then millions more in sales taxes from the families who buy them. No wonder all those pumpkins are smiling!

Next up, pumpkin pie: in 2015, Costco alone sold 5.3 million of them at $5.99 each. For those of you who weren't math majors, that's $31.7 million worth of creamy goodness. The high fat content in the crust, along with the egg-based custard filling, make them ideal for freezing until Christmas. So pick up two or three, and consider the extra sales tax a small price to pay for the taste of nostalgia.

And next, there's canned pumpkin pie filling. A couple of years ago, a vicious rumor started making the rounds that the glop you whip into your pie is actually just butternut squash. But Libby's, the Nestle subsidiary that sells $130 million of canned pumpkin filling every year, reports that they're just using a different strain of pumpkin that makes a richer, sweeter puree than regular carving pumpkins. Governments collecting sales on the pies can sigh in relief that they're not abetting a scam.

But while we're on the topic of "Things That Aren't Really Pumpkin for $200, Alex," pies are just the warmup for the real action. Love it or hate it (and there's not a lot of in-between), it's pumpkin spice season. It started as a twee Starbucks gimmick. But today's Pumpkin Spice Industrial Complex has inched its creepy tentacles into everything from candles to kale chips, and donuts to dog treats. Head to your doctor to get a flu shot, and the nurse will probably ask if you want pumpkin spice with that.

Here's the thing. Pumpkin spice — a blend of cinnamon, nutmeg, ginger, cloves, and allspice — started out as something called "pumpkin pie spice" to amp up the sometimes-bland pies. But lazy Americans quickly dropped the "pie" part. And ever since 2004, when Starbucks rolled out their flavored lattes nationwide, pumpkin spice has become a symbol for all things autumn. Americans will gobble $600 million worth of the stuff this fall, putting millions more in tax collectors' pockets.

Now, this whole discussion may sound like a silly exercise. (Ok, it is.) But there's an important lesson lurking under the filling and the whipped cream. Every financial decision you make has at least some tax consequence, even if it's just a trip to the bakery aisle. That's why it's so important to keep us involved before big financial choices, and avoid expensive tax mistakes! 

"Ardente!" is Portuguese for "Hot!"

Tax collectors generally don't choose their line of work for the pay. Glassdoor.com, a gossipy website covering salaries and careers, reports the average Revenue Agent earns $73,967. Careerbliss.com tells us the average criminal investigator earns $99,000 — which makes sense considering there's at least a chance they get shot at while working. That's not bad coin . . . but it's hardly enough to party with the rich and famous.

But what's true here in the United States may not be true in the rest of the world. Our neighbors to the south in Brazil have been transfixed lately by a sordid scandal of glitz and bling featuring — you guessed it — a gang of tax collectors, accused of helping construction companies evade over $200 million in taxes.

Our story starts, as so many tawdry stories do, with a woman scorned. Luis Alexandre Cardoso de Magalhaes met his former girlfriend, Vanessa Alcantara, at a sleazy nightclub. (She says they met when she tried to sell him a cellphone plan.) Magalhaes worked as a tax inspector for the city of Sao Paolo, earning $82,000 to oversee the city's "Imposto sobre Servicos," or service tax. He was also, it turns out, working with three other officials to help developers evade the tax. The builders delivered bags of cash with up to $30,000 every week to his office. Magalhaes would spirit the cash out of the building, and he and Alcantara would count it and divvy it up together in her living room.

And what did our young lovers do with their ill-gotten gains? Secure their retirement with a portfolio of carefully diversified mutual funds and prudently-laddered municipal bonds? (That wouldn't make much of a story, would it?) No — they blew the loot on $500 boxes of Cuban cigars, $2,260 bottles of wine, a Porsche Cayenne, and private plane rides to resorts on Angra dos Reis, an island off the coast. The couple dropped $50,000 to decorate Alcantara's apartment and splurged on $2,200 hotel suites. Magalhaes also showered up to $4,500 a night on a cavalcade of young women who valued their cash flow more than their virtue.

The party came to an end, as all parties must, when Magalhaes and Alcantara separated after giving birth to a son, and Alcantara became enraged at what she saw as a meager monthly child support offer. She dimed him out to city prosecutors, and the story went straight to the tabloids. The case has even produced two brand-new celebrities — Magalhaes's new girlfriend, Nagila Coelho, a personal trainer who plans to start her own line of bikinis, and Alcantara herself, who plans to run for office. Her proposed slogan? "Being a thief is easy; I'll be honest among the thieves."

We understand that you want to pay less tax, too. But we know you're not willing to risk scandal to do it. So we give you a plan to pay less, legally. Everything we do is court-tested and IRS-approved. The best part is, there's still time to act before 2013 draws to a close. So call us now for the plan you need!

Very Serious Stuff

When most of us think "taxes," we think of federal taxes -- the IRS, Form 1040, and everyone's favorite holiday, April 15. It's true that the IRS is full of Very Serious People collecting Very Serious Taxes. But we can't forget state and local governments either. They collect their fair share of serious taxes -- but they impose some pretty silly tax laws, too. Here are some of our favorites:

• California offers a tax exemption for income you receive to settle claims arising out of the Armenian genocide. If you or your ancestors were persecuted by the Ottoman Turkish Empire between 1915 and 1923, your income from that settlement is tax-exempt. But sadly, if the persecution occurred in 1924 or later, your friends in Sacramento want a share.

• California also imposes a 33% tax on fresh fruit bought from vending machines. Apparently, the folks in charge of promoting healthy lifestyles would rather see you buy cookies or potato chips!

• Maryland imposes a $5.00/month "Chesapeake Bay Restoration Fee" on homeowners and businesses to raise funds to improve sewer treatment plants that discharge into the bay. Naturally, taxpayers have dubbed it the "flush tax."

• Minnesota and several other states impose a tax on marijuana -- in Minnesota, it's $3.50 per gram. But wait, you say . . . pot isn't even legal in Minnesota, is it? Well, no, it's not . . . but if dealers don't pay the tax, the state has another way to bust them. (Remember who finally got Al Capone?) So . . . genius? Or evil genius?

• New York lets you buy bagels and take them home to eat without paying sales tax. But let the counter man slice it, and now it's a "prepared" meal for on-premises consumption -- and subject to an 8% sales tax.

• Oregon generously gives double amputees a $50 tax credit. But lose just one limb and you're out of luck. (Apparently, it costs an arm and a leg to be disabled in Oregon!)

• South Carolina offers a $50 per carcass "Venison for Charity" credit, with an actual form (SC Schedule TC-51) for licensed butchers and meat packers who donate deer meat for distribution to the needy. (We're not making this up.)

• Washington's King County, which includes Seattle, imposes a new $50 fee to report a death to the Medical Examiner's office. Officials call it a crime-prevention measure to give the government enough money to look at more questionable deaths for evidence of crime.

Governments have always found silly ways to nickel-and-dime their citizens. And some of those are just plain unavoidable. (If you live in Maryland's Chesapeake Bay watershed and you've got to go, well, you've just got to go.) But there's nothing silly about wasting money on taxes you don't have to pay. That's why we specialize in proactive tax planning to help pay less. Do you think you paid too much on April 15? Give us a call and let's see if we can save you some serious money!

Sneaky Sneaker Tax

Sneaky Sneaker Tax

Today's tight economy is forcing governments at every level to stretch for new revenue, with varying degrees of success. In Washington, the dysfunctional family known as "Congress" just raised the top income tax rate to 39.6%, and there are new taxes on earned income and investment income as well. But when President Obama proposed cutting loopholes to raise even more money as an alternative to the budget sequester, his idea was met mostly with scorn. 

Most state governments are in fiscal hot water, too. But Illinois may be worst off of all. Nearly $100 billion in unfunded pension liability is crushing the state budget. Last week, the bond ratings agency Standard & Poor's downgraded the Land of Lincoln's score to last in the nation. Ratings rival Moodys ranks Illinois at the same level as the African nation of Botswana. (Some observers might ask what else you could expect from a state that defines "bipartisanship" as having both Democratic and Republican ex-governors in jail at the same time.) 

The cash crunch has left Illinois's discretionary spending programs gasping for funding. So it's no surprise that beleaguered lawmakers are looking for creative ways to protect favored programs. And one representative thinks he's found a solution. State Rep. Will Davis (D-Hazel Crest) has proposed a 25 cent tax on athletic shoes which would raise $3 million per year for Illinois YouthBuild, a nonprofit organization with 16 programs providing job training for disadvantaged youth. 

Targeted taxes are nothing new, of course. The federal gasoline tax raises about $25 billion per year, with most of that dedicated to the Highway Trust Fund. Governments are especially fond of so-called "sin taxes" targeting irresponsible or undesireable behavior. That's why we see cigarette tax revenue going towards lung cancer research, soda taxes targeting obesity, and even a new 10% tax on tanning bed revenue. 

And a sneaker tax sounds simple enough -- especially compared to, say, the rules for Alternative Minimum Tax net operating loss carryforwards. (That's a real thing, by the way, and it's every bit as awful as it sounds.) But as is usually the case with taxes, the devil's in the details. Davis's tax would apply to any "shoe designed primarily for sports or other forms of physical activity." So, does "walking" count? What about hiking boots, ski boots, or snowshoes? Will there be refundable credits for sneaker-buying families earning less than the poverty level?

 But the real problem is that Rep. Davis's sneaker tax might open the floodgates to imitators. Just consider what other targeted taxes might be next:

• A tax on Valentine's Day flowers to support marriage counseling services?

• A tax on snowplows to support research into global climate change?

• A tax on footballs to keep replacement refs off the field?

• A tax on "reality TV" shows to support public broadcasting?

Nobody really wants to see new taxes, of course. But we all know we have to pay something. What sort of new tax could you support, and where would you spend the revenue it raises? Let us know what you think. And remember, no matter what gets taxed, we're here to help you pay less!

Green Apples

Green Apple

For 20 years now, Apple has blazed a reputation for stylish design and innovative products, creating a near-cult following among fans. Apple's computers appeal to the artists and designers who set so many of today's trends. Their iPod has helped change how the world listens to music. Their iPad has made online content available nearly anywhere. And their iPhone is helping change the way we communicate with friends, family, and colleagues. (Just a few years ago, your mother-in-law didn't have a cell phone. Now she sends text messages and "checks in" on Facebook.)

Apple may be the most successful company on earth. At one point last year, they had more cash on hand ($76.2 billion) than the United States government ($73.8 billion). And Apple is currently the most valuable company on the planet, with a "market cap" (total value of tradeable shares) that topped $590 billion dollars on April 10. (That's right . . . those iTunes you casually download for a buck each have created a company worth over half a trillion dollars.) In fact, Apple's current market cap is more than the gross domestic products of Iraq, North Korea, Vietnam, Puerto Rico, and New Zealand -- combined.

But Apple's most recent annual report reveals the company's genius for creating successful marketing strategies also extends to successful tax strategies. How else would you describe a strategy that lets Apple earn billions and pays less than 10% of their taxable income in tax?

How do they do it? Largely by keeping the money they earn outside the United States, outside the United States. Apple owns subsidiaries in tax havens like Ireland, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, and the British Virgin islands. They helped pioneer the "Double Irish with a Dutch Sandwich" strategy that hundreds of other multinational companies have imitated. Apple even maintains a subsidiary in tax-free Nevada -- the blandly-named "Braeburn Capital" -- to manage that enormous cash haul without paying tax in its home state of California. For 2011, the company paid a worldwide tax of $3.3 billion on $34.2 billion of profit. But one study concludes that Apple would have paid $2.4 billion more without these rules.

Now Apple has become part of the political debate. At the risk of grossly oversimplifying a pretty complicated discussion, Democrats in Washington scoff that taking an extra $2.4 billion in tax last year would have squelched Apple's creativity. Republicans reply that using the cash to grow the business or distribute more dividends to shareholders will grow the economy faster than if it goes to the IRS. Both President Obama and presumed Republican nominee Mitt Romney have called for eliminating corporate tax loopholes in order to pay for lower rates (28% in President Obama's plan, 25% in Governor Romney's). Either way, Apple is likely to become one of the stories -- like Warren Buffett paying a higher tax rate than his secretary -- that come to define this year's campaign.

Taxes always play a part in Presidential races. But this time, with the economy still struggling and the Bush tax cuts scheduled to expire in a few short months, taxes will be even more important than usual. Our job, as November approaches, includes helping you understand just what the candidates' proposals mean for your bottom line. So keep up with these emails -- and if you're curious how any of the proposals you hear about would affect your plan, call us!

"Like" This

America's economy continues to sputter. But stocks are picking up steam and flirting with four-year highs. We're even seeing new "dot-coms" hitting the market. Last May, the social networking site LinkedIn went public at $45 per share, then leaped to $94.25 in its first day of trading. Internet coupon vendor Groupon opened in November at $20 per share, then jumped 31% on its first day of trading. And earlier this month, Facebook filed registration papers with the Securities and Exchange Commission for what may be the hottest IPO since Google.

Companies typically go public to raise money to expand. But Facebook doesn't really need cash from an IPO. The company made nearly $4 billion in advertising revenue in 2011. So why go public?

Well, companies also go public to let founders and early investors cash out. Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook's 27-year-old founder, is already a "paper" billionaire, ranked #14 on the Forbes 400 list of richest Americans. (Not many entreprenuers find themselves richer than Scrooge McDuck while still at an age that they watch Scrooge McDuck.) But Facebook's IPO will give Zuckerberg and fellow early investors liquidity, converting paper wealth into cash for the houses, charitable gifts, and other spending that new dot-com millionaires historically indulge in.

The IPO will also stick Zuckerberg with a historically large tax bill. (You knew that was coming, right?) In fact, one of the big reasons the company is going public in the first place is give Zuckerberg a way to pay taxes when he exercises options to buy even more stock.

Here's how it works. For tax purposes, the value of most stock options is treated as compensation and fixed the day you exercise them — whether you actually sell them or not. Let's say you pay $5 to exercise a share of your employer's stock, on a day when that stock is worth $25. Your company gets a deduction for that $20 per share, even though there's no cash outlay. That's great for the company. But at the same time, you'll owe immediate tax on $20 of income, even if you hold the stock in hope of future appreciation. (If the stock tanks before you actually sell, you still owe tax on that gain.) That may not be so great for you!

Zuckerberg currently owns 414 million shares of Facebook. He also has options to buy another 120 million shares for — get this — just six cents each. Zuckerberg has announced plans to exercise those options and sell enough shares to cover his taxes. We don't know yet what Facebook shares will trade for. However, private-market trades have valued shares at $40 each. If Zuckerberg exercises all 120 million options when shares are valued at that price, his taxable gain will be nearly $5 billion. He'll owe 35% to the IRS, plus 10.3% to the state of California, for a total tax bill of over $2 billion. That's right, billion with a "b." Can you imagine signing a return with a billion-dollar tax bill? How about signing a check for that much — payable to the IRS!

The important thing to realize here is that Zuckerberg's tax bill came as no surprise. It's actually the result of careful planning. Remember, Zuckerberg's pain is Facebook's gain. The strategy will probably give Facebook enough deductions to wipe out the entire tax on its 2011 profit, plus refunds from 2009 and 2010, plus even more to carry forward.

Think about that the next time you click the "Like" button on your computer. And remember, we're here to bring the same sort of smart tax planning to your business.

IRS Goes Where The Money Is

IRS Goes Where The Money Is

The outlaw Willie Sutton stole an estimated $2 million over a 40-year career robbing banks -- and scored the ultimate "success" in his business, living long enough to die of natural causes. Sutton always carried a pistol or Tommy gun with him on jobs, declaring "you can't rob a bank on charm and personality." But the gun was never loaded, because, as he said, someone might have gotten hurt! And he became legendary, ironically, for something he never actually said. According to the story, Sutton was asked why he robbed banks -- and replied "because that's where the money is." But in his 1976 autobiography, Where the Money Was: The Memoirs of a Bank Robber, he confessed that credit for the line belongs to "some enterprising reporter who apparently felt a need to fill out his copy."

What does a depression-era bank robber have to do with taxes? Well, the IRS estimates that outlaw taxpayers cost the Treasury $385 billion per year in uncollected taxes -- roughly 15% of the amount they believe is due under current law. So they work hard to close that gap. In FY 2011, the IRS employed over 22,000 revenue officers, revenue agents, and special agents. They conducted 391,621 "field" audits and 1,173,069 less-intensive "correspondence" audits. They filed levies on 3.7 million taxpayers and filed over a million liens. But they can't turn over every rock. So how do they case their targets?

Earlier this month, the IRS released their FY 2011 Enforcement and Service Results revealing how likely you are to be audited. And even Willie Sutton would have appreciated the IRS's "M.O.":

• If you make less than $200,000, your overall audit risk is only about one in a hundred. (Of course, that average encompasses a range of possibilities. If you run a sole proprietorship in a cash-heavy business like takeout pizza, your risk may be far higher.)

• If you make over $200,000, your overall audit risk rises to about one in twenty-five. Obviously, the IRS sees more opportunity in chasing higher income earners.

• If you pull down over $1 million, your audit risk rises again to one in eight. Welcome to the 1%!

The IRS likes targeting entertainers, athletes, and other celebrities, too. Sure, it sets a high-profile example for the rest of us. But it's also (spoiler alert) where the money is. Take Hollywood trainwreck Lindsay Lohan, for example. Google her name, and you'll usually find it followed by "failed another breathalyzer test" or "missed her court-appointed community service." But last week, Lohan made a different kind of headline. That's right, the IRS filed a lien against her home seeking $93,701.57 in upaid taxes from 2009.

Where does that all leave us as we move into this year's tax season? Our job is to help you pay the minimum tax allowed by law. But we know the IRS is out to challenge us. So we don't cut corners. We give you good, solid planning. That way, even if you do lose the "audit lottery," you'll feel safe knowing your savings are court-tested and IRS-approved.

Secrets of a Tax Free Life

I'm so excited to share this news with you!  Several months ago, I was asked to collaborate with some of the top Certified Tax Coaches from all around the country, assembling our best strategies for legally planning for and minimizing your tax burden.

We've all been hard at work writing "Secrets of a Tax Free Life, Surprising Write-Off Strategies Most Business Owners Miss!"  

Would you please consider marking your calendar to buy the book during the third week of January 2012? I'll send you a link as the date gets closer to help you remember.   

Your support would mean a lot to me and help me in my efforts to become a  best-selling author!  

I appreciate your support!   

Thanks!

 Larry Stone

P.S. - We've put together a bonus package for those of you who help us launch the book that day. Stay tuned for details! 

Nickels and Dimes

Last Thursday, cellphone carrier Verizon Wireless announced a new $2 fee for one-time payments made online or over the phone. On Friday, the Federal Communications Commission immediately announced they were "concerned about Verizon's actions" and planned to look into the matter. At the same time, over 158,000 visitors signed an online petition demanding that Verizon drop the fee. In fact, the website hosting the petition expressed shock that "while you are instituting this new fee, Verizon paid zero federal income tax from 2008-2010, and actually got almost a billion dollars in rebates from taxpayers." Verizon immediately beat a hasty retreat and dropped the proposed fee.

Verizon is hardly the only corporate giant to float new fees, only to see them immediately fall back to earth. Back in September, Bank of America announced plans to charge a $5 monthly fee for customers making debit card purchases -- then, after howls of customer protest, backed off just five weeks later. Other banks, which had tested similar debit card fees, killed their fees too in the wake of the protests.

There's a pattern developing here. In today's struggling economy, companies can't impose the broad-based price hikes they really want. So they settle for nickel-and-diming us with junk fees. Unfortunately for them, consumers are pushing back -- and at least with Verizon and the banks, the customers are winning.

There's a similar pattern at work in today's Washington. Candidates can talk 'till they're blue in the face about bold sweeping change, like Rick Perry's 20% flat tax and Herman Cain's attention-grabbing "9-9-9" plan. (If you close your eyes right now, I bet you can still hear Cain saying "9-9-9" in your head.) But in today's hyper-partisan Congress, the actual legislators in charge of implementing all those bright ideas can't find the consensus to name a Post Office, let alone remake the tax code in any meaningful way. So they settle for nickel-and-diming the system -- extending the payroll tax holiday for a miserly 60 days instead of a full year, and paying for it by levying fees on mortgages sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac rather than by raising taxes on million-dollar earners. Even when legislators extend new breaks, they tend to be for small amounts, like the $800 "Making Work Pay" credit or $1,500 for home energy improvements. New tax breaks also tend to be short-lived: the 2009 deduction for sales tax on new cars lasted 10½ months, and the much-ballyhooed "Cash for Clunkers" program lasted just 56 days.

The problem, of course, is that Washington's version of nickel-and-diming us adds up fast. A couple of bucks for online bill payments here and $5 for monthly debit-card usage there? Maybe it cuts into your Starbucks budget. But closing tax breaks hurts. As former Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen famously said, "A billion here, a billion there, pretty soon you're talking real money." And IRS "customers" can't threaten to take their "business" somewhere else like customers at the bank.

2012 is an election year, of course, which means we can expect even less in the way of substantive action -- at least for the next 10 months. But that may all change after November 6, as the Bush tax cuts expire after December 31. If the upcoming election leaves Washington as divided as it is now, we can expect a repeat of last summer's debt-ceiling battle. Our job is to keep on top of all the news to safeguard your nickels and dimes, regardless of what happens in November. And that means planning. Remember, being proactive, now, is the key to keeping your tax bill as low as possible in 2012 and beyond. So, if one of your New Year's resolutions is to get out in front of the tax nickel-and-dimers, give us a call!

10 Most Expensive Tax Mistakes That Cost Business Owners Thousands

10 Most Expensive Tax Mistakes That Cost Business Owners Thousands!

 If you’re like most real estate investors, you waste thousands of dollars every year in taxes you don’t need to pay. Attend our entertaining, fast-paced seminar to learn how to take advantage of these strategies and more:

 The single most expensive tax mistake of all

• How to slash your audit risk (Fly under the IRS radar!)

• Powerful strategies for property “flippers”

• Tax-advantaged retirement savings strategies

• How to make the most of meals, entertainment, and gifts

• The “mileage allowance” mistakes that cost thousands!

• Write off family medical bills as a real estate expense.

• How to deduct your kids’ private school and college tuition

 Larry Stone, Stone CPA-Colorado Tax Coach, is a Certified Tax Coach and successful real estate investor in multi-family housing.  He has specialized training in tax reduction strategies and uses a comprehensive system to save you money in the real estate industry.  Larry is co-authoring a book called “The Secrets of a Tax Free Life” with an expected publishing date of January 2012.

Thursday, January 5th

6:00 PM

Mastermind Investor Group

Double Tree Hotel

3203 Quebec Street

Denver CO 80207

For more information, see http://mastermindinvestors.net/calendar-of-events.  Mastermind Investors Group requires a $10 fee from all attendees of their meetings.