Tiny Violins for Very Large Men

2019 is here, and it's almost time to file your first tax return under the new law. But you probably sat around watching sports all weekend instead of talking taxes, didn't you. (Did Santa bring a new TV?) So, as we ring in the New Year, let's take a look at how the new tax bill affects some of those athletes you've been watching.

Washington sold the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act as "tax simplification." And really, who can't raise a toast to that? Lower rates! Higher standard deductions! A 1040 you can fill out on a postcard! But many taxpayers, especially those in high-tax states like New York and California, can be forgiven if they feel like they woke up with a massive hangover. Deductions for state and local income and property taxes are now capped at $10,000, regardless of income. And employee business deductions are nixed entirely. That's going to be pricey for the Very Large Men we mentioned in the title.

Take 6'8" NBA superstar Lebron James. He's played in Cleveland, where state and local taxes total 7.5%. He's played in tax-free Miami. And now he's playing in Los Angeles, where he pays 13.3%. (13.3% going to California sure sounds like a technical foul.) Under the old rules, he could deduct whatever he actually paid. Now the refs limit him to the same $10,000 as the rookies earning the league minimum. Granted, that minimum is $838,464. But doesn't it make sense to let a guy paying tax on 43 times that amount actually deduct 43 times as much?

Income taxes won't be the only expense to bite King James under the new rules. He owns a $9 million house in his hometown of Akron (where $9 million buys a lot of house), a $21 million house in Brentwood (where $21 million still buys a pretty nice crib), and a $23 million house in Brentwood. (Not a typo.) Property taxes on those homes reach well into six figures, if not seven. But now he'll watch those deductions bounce off the rim and rebound into IRS hands.

Even athletes who play in states with no income tax used to be able to deduct non-employee business expenses: agents' and managers' fees, health club and training expenses, travel expenses, and players' union dues. But now those are gone, too. Agents typically take 10% of a client athlete's salary and endorsement income, which means losing that deduction alone can eliminate the benefit of lower overall rates.

The new law does give LeBron one potentially important break. Charitable deductions used to be capped at 50% of adjusted gross income. The new law raises that limit to 60%. LeBron is famously charitable, especially for educational causes, and may appreciate that change someday.

As for that postcard-sized tax return? Well, yes, the IRS has released a new Form 1040. And yes, you can print it on a postcard. But don't get too excited. They've just stripped out half of the information from the old 1040 and dumped it into six pages of Schedules. Have capital gains to report, or student loan interest to deduct? You'll have to file Schedule 1. Owe AMT? Schedule 2 is just four lines . . . but there goes your postcard. Need to pay self-employment tax? Welcome to Schedule 4. And who wants to report their income where the mailman can see it on its way to the IRS, anyway?

This New Year, millions of Americans will pick cliched resolutions like eating less, exercising more, crying less, or smoking more. (Possibly a typo.) We'd like to suggest something a little more profitable: minimizing the bite that taxes take out of your year. Call us to save, and make 2019 your best year ever!

Resolutions We'd Like to See

2014 is here, and it's time for New Years' resolutions. Americans across the country are pledging to lose weight, quit smoking, exercise, and find new jobs. Some of them will succeed, others will lose faith before the first snowmelt. (Want to make a fortune? Open a gym that turns into a sports bar on February 1!) So we thought we would take this opportunity to suggest some resolutions to the folks who determine how much tax we pay.

• Congress: Put the Tax Code on a diet. According to one count, our tax code runs nearly 4 million words. That's four times the words in all the Harry Potter books put together, with none of the magic and wizardry. (You may think we work a version of the "obliteration charm" when we save you thousands in tax, but we assure you there's nothing supernatural involved.) We say it's high time to put the Tax Code on a diet — and if that doesn't work, try bypass surgery. We can raise just as much money for the government without dragging down the economy the way the tax code does.

The problem, of course, is that there's no agreement in Washington to accomplish anything so ambitious. Our current Congress is widely considered to be the least productive in history, at least if you consider "bills passed" to be the right measure of productivity. House Speaker John Boehner has said that Congress should be measured by how many bills they repeal — if he's serious, maybe he can start with nightmares like the Alternative Minimum Tax, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and the passive activity loss rules.

Back in 1986, Ronald Reagan cited the following language from the tax code (defining private foundations, if you're curious), to help make his case for comprehensive tax reform: "For purposes of paragraph (3), an organization described in paragraph (2) shall be deemed to include an organization described in section 501(c)(4), (5), or (6) which would be described in paragraph (2) if it were an organization described in section 501(c)(3)." Congress has passed a dozen "tax simplification" laws since then, and the language Reagan cited still remains. (Congress must have spent their time working on the really confusing stuff!)

• IRS: Focus on customer service. Fighting IRS red tape makes a trip to the DMV look like a stay at a five-star hotel. The average hold time to speak to someone at the agency rose to 17 minutes in 2012, but the percentage of callers who actually get help fell to 68%. Mail is even slower — nearly half their correspondence takes more than 6½ weeks to answer. No private-sector business would accept those kinds of results.

The problem here is that the IRS simply has an impossible job. They don't make the tax laws, but get blamed for them just the same. They don't get the budget they need to do their job, but get blamed for falling down on it just the same. (For Fiscal 2011, the IRS collected $2.52 trillion in tax with a budget of just $11.8 billion, which makes a pretty phenomenal return on investment of 214:1.) Few members of Congress want to be known for giving the IRS more money. But funding for basic technology and customer service shouldn't be nearly as hard a case to make as funding for more aggressive enforcement.

As for us, we're resolving to bring you even better, more proactive tax advice. That process starts with a comprehensive plan to take advantage of every deduction, credit, and strategy you legally deserve. If you don't already have one, maybe you should make getting one your resolution for 2014!